A suborbital test flight was conducted in April 2018. $13/kg works out to about $2,000,000/flight for a 150kg 150,000kg payload. SpaceX, for example, has demonstrated the potential of reusable rockets. Not including Orion, that's another billion. Sign up here if you are not already subscribed to our blog. The cost depends on the rocket, and on the percent capacity of said rocket, but here's a few numbers for you, cost in U.S. dollars/kg to LEO ( Wikipedia *). As of 2023, Falcon Heavy has only flown in partially reusable configurations; fully expendable configuration is considered operational in the sense that it is a simplified version of the reusable configuration. This is a transformative change for humanity be because it makes access to space cheap and relatively easy. Which is still a major improvement, but not nearly enough to hit Spacex's goals. The booster engine pack would jettison from the stage, deploy an inflatable re-entry heat shield, and eventually pop a parachute for helicopter recovery. Developing PROTEUS, an innovative hybrid and autonomous launcher for small sats, Providing launch services via HABs and sounding rockets, Long range heavy lift aircraft horizontal launches, Developing Infinity, a small reusable rocket, Developing high-performance, low carbon micro launch vehicles, Developing electromagnetic launch systems to change how we launch payloads into space, Developing a proposed "railway" to space that is safer, cheaper, and greener than rockets, Building a ballooning platform to offer novel access to the mesosphere, Aiming to provide affordable space tourism and rocket launch services, Dedicated to providing frequent and reliable space access, Disrupting space launch with a new kinetic launch system, Vertically launching low-cost orbital payloads from the UK, Designer of low-weight, low-cost satellites and small launching vehicles, SpaceBox is a suborbital launch and recovery platform designed to enable affordable access to space for educational, professional, consumer and hobbyist payloads, Making access to space widely available, less constrained and more efficient, Developing technology for cost effective, reliable, and frequent access to space, Developing the Otis electric vehicle for civil space transportation, Developing a solution for quick missions to LEO, Designing a single stage to orbit hypersonic vehicle of revolutionary design and propulsion capability, Building a single-stage to orbit launch system dedicated to small payloads, Developing an eco friendly, electromagnetic space launch system, Developing the Cheetah small launch vehicle, Aiming to provide orbital launches of small satellites for the most affordable prices, Rocketsan is developing a micro-satellite launch system for the Turkish government, Developing a reusable launch vehicle named Tianmeng, Working on a very low-cost Launcher to LEO, Building low cost, single stage and highly reusable launch vehicles, Customized launch services for sub-orbital and orbital payloads, Launching small satellites into space using high altitude balloons, Creating a dedicated, reusable, and low-cost suborbital rocket, Developing the UKs first commercially operated horizontal launch company for small to medium size satellites, Developing a hybrid, modular, affordable & air-launched rocket system that uses electric landing for reusability, Developing SOL ASPIRET, a suborbital spaceplane, Bringing about the next generation of low-cost, reusable launch vehicles, Developing a balloon-launched vehicle for smallsat payloads, Developing a unique seaborne launch system, Personalized engineering support and dedicated airborne orbital launch platform, Ultra low-cost rockets and satellite deployment, Revolutionizing near space tourism and opening it to a greater audience, Developing a reliable tow-glider launch system, Affordable and reliable small satellite launch system for LEO, SSO, and GEO missions, Developing a fleet of hybrid rockets for micro launch, Aiming to innovate space exploration technologies to deliver efficient and cost effective solutions for humanity, Developing single stage to orbit, fixed wing, hypersonic aircraft, Creating the small-sat launch vehicle of the future, Building light, two-stage rockets for small satellite launch, Cheaper access to space for nanosatellite payloads, Developing a novel, reusable hypersonic and space launch system, Developing exciting new space technologies, Developing a three-stage solid-propellant launch vehicle, Developing a reusable two-stage orbital-class launch vehicle, Striving to design, build, and launch rockets, in and from Canada, Developing the Phoenix small launch vehicle, Developing the Trans-Atmospheric Flight Vehicle (TAV 1), Hypersonic Delivery Systems: Suborbital & Orbital Missions, Developing suborbital and orbital launch vehicles, Developing a series of Launch Vehicles based on high-altitude air launch, Building a hypersonic space plane that can takeoff from anywhere in any weather, Developing the Space Jet air-launch platform, Developing a unique launch vehicle and propulsion system, Building a space launch system for sending hardened satellites and bulk cargo into space, Designing the Montenegro nanolauncher for launches at a very competitive price, The Dynamics Enhanced Launch Vehicle is designed for a life of over 400 reuses with very minimal maintenance and rapid turnarounds, Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO) rocket leveraging aerospike engine technology launching to low earth orbit, Providing rapid response small satellite launch vehicles for government and commercial customers, Provding dedicated launch services for cube and nanosatellites, Developing the Horizontal Takeoff Horizontal Landing (HTHL) AstroClipper for the future of commercial space transportation, Developing the Advanced Cryognic Expendable (ACE) launch vehicle, Developing a next generation of reusable launch vehicles for microgravity research. "The Great Escape: SLS Provides Power for Missions to the Moon". These companies and their launch vehicles are in various stages of development, with some (such as SpaceX, RocketLab, and ULA) already in regular operation, while many new companies dont yet have financing or hardware. The operational costs of dismantling the engines for check-out, combined with the detailed thermal protection system maintenance and repair, meant the fastest turn-around-time between launches for the Space Shuttle was ~3 months. It is able to place about 2300 kg in a reference 700 km-polar orbit. Units may be by weight, volume, length, area or number. I had an engaging conversation with STOKE co-founder and CEO Andy Lapsa who said the framework they use is low-cost on-demand access much closer to final orbit. They plan to deliver this capability for customers through an actively cooled thermal protection system for their fully reusable second stage. ULA is also considering a modular reusable design for Vulcan. Weve also provided a considerable amount of additional data gathered during our research. We are also eager to learn about any additional data sources that can help us in our ongoing research, so please feel free to share any resources you know of with our team. This subreddit is not an official outlet for SpaceX information. The cost of the actual flight is about the same, but the fixed costs can be deferred over many more flights, costs are in the $100/kg range. Launch costs refer to the cost of sending a payload from the ground to outer space, specifically low Earth orbit (LEO). However, before being judgmental and dismissive, one must look at what ISRO has achieved with its shoestring budget. If youre a micro-satellite operator who cant sit around waiting for a larger launch vehicle to sell all its payload slots to other customers, this is a game-changer. Space Launch System launch cost to LEO: $200,000,000/140,000 kg = 14,286 $/kg Starship's fuel alone probably costs $200,000 let alone anything else. The price of a Falcon 9 launch has gone up from $62 million to $67 million. Amazon, with $55.4 billion on hand, is the only large tech player with an announced constellation, but Facebook ($54.9 billion) has reportedly filed preliminary LEO-satellite plans through a proxy. the vehicle's number of successful orbital launches. physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism. (Hot fire is the vernacular for lighting a rocket engine combustor. Computers & the Internet The first batch of new engines was much more than that, not including the cost for building the factory. SpaceX's website previously listed the cost of a Falcon 9 launch at $62 million. kilogram of payload to low Earth orbit (LEO). Beyond 1 million AD, AI & Robotics When deciding on a launch vehicle, one should also consider other factors such as volumetric constraints, launch sites, and the availability of ride-sharing services. GTO payload is 5,550 kg when the first stage lands downrange on a drone ship (ASDS). Saturday's SpaceX launch finally removed NASA's dependence on Russia to get its astronauts into . starstarstarstar. Will an automated inspection solution be enough to increase its launch cadence? In 2017, the addition of a small third stage enabled orbital launches of ultra-light. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. 134,501. Of those, 32 launches were American and 26 belonged to SpaceX's Falcon 9 . Falcon 9 NAFCOM Updated Cost Estimate Comparison Updated (Cost Plus Fee Vs. Firm Fixed Price) Firm Fixed Price Acquisition Cost Plus Fee Acquisition Weight DDT&E 2 Test Flt Units Total DDT&E 2 Test Flt Units Total Elements (()lbs) (FY2010 $$)M) (FY2010 $$)M) (FY2010 $$)M) (FY2010 $$)M) (FY2010 $$)M) (FY2010 $$)M) [note 4]. Can anyone find a pie chart showing what part of this is so expensive? What are Some Ways to Decrease Launch Costs. In this example, its shorthand for saying the engine will turn on for 3 qualification tests and once at lift-off.). If one needed repair, it was done by hand. A reusable rocket engine design will carry more safety margin. I know not to underestimate Elon but Ill believe that when I see it. The key innovation that enabled the space shuttle to be reusable was also the reason it was so complex to maintain. The Funding column is set to sort alphabetically. All this enabled their development of the Falcon 9, which provides a lower cost per . In the coming months we will post SFR ratings for companies from all of these sectors, providing a robust overview of the state of frontier-enabling companies across the industry. For comparison, SpaceX sells a commercial version of its Falcon 9 rocket for $62 million, according to the company's website, although the price climbs to more than $90 million a copy for . Last updated: 1st September 2018. A prior version of the SS-520 flew twice as a suborbital sounding rocket in 1998 and 2000. (They need to launch an orbital mission first before any future conjecture on the design is warranted!). Methuselah Foundation, the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and the Lifeboat Foundation. (Larger payloads can cost more per kilogram because there are fewer alternatives for the harder launches.) Important Note (Companies not Vehicles): This database, and the SpaceFund Reality ratings, are based on COMPANIES, not launch vehicles. All those hidden cost personnel hours to refurbish contribute to 90% of a reusable vehicles launch costs, as shown in the famous iceberg chart below. TL;DR God bless Elon for being the driving catalyst behind the New Space Renaissance. They charge on the order of $60/month. 12 These companies and others Comparing Costs for Space Launch Vehicles. Humankind has been flinging scientific equipment, satellites, and even living things (including the occasional astronaut) into orbit for more than 50 years, often for eye-watering sums of money that only governments could afford. Launch costs have been pretty much the same since the earliest days of space exploration, mostly due to an unchanging underlying technology: chemical rockets. Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world. Seattle-based startup STOKE Space Technologies thinks so. the Apollo program had a cost per seat of $390 million while the Space Shuttle's figure was $170 . ), Planetary Surface <-> Space (Lunar landers, space elevators for use on the Moon or Mars, etc. Have we missed your company? The rapid development of NewSpace and the expansion of the small satellite market have increased the demand for private launcher companies capable of providing a full range of launch services at an affordable price. Apple AirPods with Charging Case - 2nd Generation, White. Click on theblackbuttons below to view the available SFR databases. Backing breakthrough scientific inventions transforming billions of lives. No payload fairing with the Starliner on board", "Pair of Chinese launches put classified and commercial satellites into orbit", "Delta IV Launch Services User's Guide, June 2013", "Rocket Lab Increases Electron Payload Capacity, Enabling Interplanetary Missions and Reusability", "Epsilon a solid propellant launch vehicle for new age", "Falcon 9 launches to orbit 56 Starlink satellitesweighing in total more than 17.4 metric tonsmarking the heaviest payload ever flown on Falcon", "Iridium's SpaceX launch slowed by Vandenberg bottleneck", "Falcon-9 v1.2 (Block 5) (Falcon-9FT (Block 5))", "Launchpad Explosion Destroys SpaceX Falcon 9 Rocket, Satellite in Florida", "Falcon-9 v1.2 (Block 5)(ex) (Falcon-9FT (Block 5)(ex))", "Side boosters landing on droneships & center expended is only ~10% performance penalty vs fully expended. PLD Space - the future of the European launch market. A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launches 143 small satellites into orbit from Space Launch Complex 40 at the Cape. So far, the average costs of launching cargo remain on par with the space shuttle at about $30,000 per lb. Beyond 10,000 AD SpaceX: . But CNBC noted in 2020 that the United States Air Force contracts paid around $95 million per Falcon 9. Spacecraft propulsion[note 1] is any method used to accelerate spacecraft and artificial satellites. We invest in companies reinventing energy, transportation, infrastructure, manufacturing, human augmentation, and agriculture. ", "Potentially, we're talking about just a few dollars per kg with the elevator." In FY21 dollars, newer launch vehicles tend to offer lower costs than older launch vehicles, with a gradual decline from 1957 to 2005, and a steeper decline between 2005 and 2020. Typical launch costs today are $10,000 US Dollars (USD) to $25,000 USD per kilogram ($4,500 to $11,000 USD per pound), though some countries subsidize space launches, occasionally reducing cost as low as $4,000 USD per kilogram ($1,800 USD per pound). Launching a rocket from the equator can minimize the necessary fuel by taking advantage of the Earth's rotation, thereby lowering the launch costs by a significant margin. Whats exciting is that they are working to do that again! The far future Bold of you to assume SLS will ever launch. https://www.nature.com/news/2006/060327/full/news060327-2.html. SpaceX's costs are still far . This comparison of orbital launch systems lists the attributes of all individual rocket configurations designed to reach orbit. If you made it through all that rocket history, you might be asking yourself the following how did SpaceX do it? Including other expenses, the total average cost per Space Shuttle flight is about $1.5 billion USD. 25 per kg ($1125 per. Do you see missing data for your company? Bringing back the "sea-launch" concept with full-force! That is not too far off the Greason-Bennett mature-market guess of $42,720. Aerospace professionals were skeptical of SpaceXs cost numbers because the only reusable launch vehicle they had data for was the space shuttle as seen in the chart below, reusable rockets werent always cheap! But unlike during the early days of NASA preeminence, the rocket launch business over the past few years has matured into one where dozens of private companies around the globe are racing to see how cheaply they can send material into space. The rocket's two stages stand 57 feet tall (15 meters) on the launchpad, and it can take payloads of up to 500 lbs. The framework Prime Movers Lab uses to think about the space economy focuses on who the end-beneficiaries are for a given capability. It should be noted that not all rocket prices are publicly available, in fact, most aren't. Falcon Heavy: \$2200 Falcon 9 v 1.1- \$4,109 DNEPR- \$3,784 Ariane 5- \$10,476 Delta IV- \$13,072 The cost of launching a satellite varies depending on the satellite mass, the orbital altitude, and the orbital inclination of the final satellite orbit. A suborbital test flight was conducted in March 2012. Where in the space economy ecosystem does one draw the line to think about Space for Space? The NASA average payload is across the 13 missions completed through 2017. Definitely not more than one flight. Latest features That means their user price is about $0.20/GB (although they only start enforcing a cap. The GTO per-kilo launch cost estimates shown in the second graphic are calculated using the lower end of any GTO payload and cost-per-launch estimate ranges provided in the FAA report.The SpaceX optimal values in the third graphic are based on the Falcon 9 launch cost and the maximum Dragon capsule, as listed on the company's website, plus the weight of the Dragon capsule from a company brochure. Each bubble represents a launch vehicle and is sized according to Examples of Space for Earth include things like DirecTV, GPS navigation, and weather satellites. When it comes to reliability, ULA has hit it out of the park the Atlas V is the only rocket ever manufactured to boast a 100% mission success rate. (Of course, SpaceX has since redesigned the engine to increase performance and for further improvements in manufacturability and cost.) This is the first installment of ourSpaceFund Reality (SFR) rating. In the case where a single company has more than one launch vehicle, the data listed is for their largest vehicle. There is a consensus that a real breakthrough in decreasing launch costs will require using some new method to get to space. A Falcon 9 rocket lifts off from Cape Canaveral carrying the Deep Space Climate Observatory satellite on SpaceXs first deep space mission on Feb. 11, 2015. Engine development is the highest risk part of a new rocket design. A useful analogy is to buying a car, where the advertised price is for the no-frills base model, while theres the option of add-ons for additional fees (say, extra boosters to launch a heavier payload). The commercial estimates are based on SpaceX's published price and maximum payload information for the Falcon 9 and Dragon capsule. Links The Ariane 5 is to be succeeded by the Ariane 6 in 2020 or 2021. However, SpaceX has stated that these numbers include a 30% margin to accommodate re-usability. Physics The rapidly decreasing cost of launch over the past decade largely stems from the decision of Elon Musk's Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) to develop a vertically integrated vehicle production line that was more reliable, adaptable, and efficient. If youd like to search within a specific column, use the search box at the bottom of that column. Lets unpack that statement a little. Launch Vehicles Capability Comparison: ISRO: As we previously described, . The main cost parameter for launch systems cost is the number of flights per vehicle. For 30 years, NASA flew an expensive (high maintenance) marvel. It's getting there, and staying. Still, these very technical big-dollar issues are increasingly being impacted by the changing economics and new generation of commercial space titans that are quickly transforming the launch industry. Thatd be revolutionary if thats true. (Military launches cost more.) star. In June 2020, Redwire acquired Made-in-Space, a provider of additive manufacturing capabilities on orbit. SpaceX increased the cost of additional. (For comparison, the Shuttles turn-around time was 24 months.) Welcome to r/SpaceXLounge, the sister subreddit to r/SpaceX, and a place for relaxed and laid-back discussion. Space Transportation Costs: Trends in Price Per Pound to Orbit 1990-2000, "As of 2003, the average launch cost/lb of payload in the U.S for small, medium, and heavy launches was $8,445, $4,994, and $4,440 respectively." The cost estimates for transportation to Mars cover a large span. This would reduce launch costs by half? Two decades ago, vigorous discussion abounded regarding the performance hit of designing for reusability, canceling any cost benefits. Many space enthusiasts will cite the McDonald Douglas Delta Clipper (DC-X) program as the first vertical rocket landing. Larger launchers, such as SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket, are able to provider cheaper costs per kilogram with high reliability which explains their positioning as cheaper producers and improved value. There are debates about the next major enabling technology is it super heavy-lift (scale efficiencies in weight delivery) or a 10x more frequent launch cadence with aircraft-like operations (and of course a reusable second stage)? To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. Editor: James E. Ellis, Dimitra Kessenides. Energy & the Environment Michael is a longtime AllTheScience contributor who specializes in topics relating to paleontology, Rocket variants are not distinguished; i.e., the Atlas V series is only counted once for all its configurations 401431, 501551, 552, and N22. Military & War Within the Transportation sector, other sub-sectors include In-Space Transportation (tugs, in-space propulsion systems, custom 3rd stages, fuel depots, etc. There are several nascent segments gaining recent momentum, such as in-space manufacturing with several startups pursuing approaches from manufacturing ZBLAN fiber optic cables (e.g. A space elevator would consist of an extremely long carbon nanotube cable, with a counterweight in geosynchronous orbit. Click on a bubble to learn more about a vehicle. We invented the better sandbag, Developing the LAROS-RC2 orbital carrier and accompanying mobile launch infrastructure, Developing a non-traditional hypervelocity launch system, On-demand air launch system utilizing standard transport aircrafts from any airport, Revolutionizing the way we transport satellites and space assets into space, Developing responsive launch services and products for the nanosatellite industry, Developing a unique ultralight rocket platform, Making it affordable for companies and universities to launch small satellites into orbit. This graph shows the declining costs of launching people and cargo into space. class in the legend to hide vehicles of that class. Click on the Reusing the Falcon 9 first stage DID deliver on the promise of dramatically lower launch costs. Our criteria for removing an entry from this database are as follows: If you feel your company has been removed from this database in error, please reach out to us directly to provide additional information. Answer (1 of 17): The cost of launching a kilogram depends on what orbit you want it in, and how big a payload it is part of. Reusable rockets emerging victorious in the great debate on cost was not always a foregone conclusion. Carissa Christensen, founder and chief executive officer of consulting firm Bryce Space and Technology, which compiled the FAA report, says theres been a 10 percent to 15 percent drop in launch costs in real terms since 2010, driven in part by SpaceX. Of those, 32 launches were American and 26 belonged to SpaceXs Falcon 9 (in its most prolific year yet). Manage Settings Handbook of Space Engineering, Archaeology, and Heritage by Ann Darrin, Beth L. O'Leary, page 116, Comparison of solid-fueled orbital launch systems, NASA, Saturn V News Reference, Appendix: Saturn V Flight History (1968), Comparison of space station cargo vehicles, "Mass of initial SN ships will be a little high & Isp a little low, but, over time, it will be ~150t to LEO fully reusable", Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center, "Russia launches first orbital Angara 1.2 rocket with military payload", "Ariane 5 sets new record on latest launch", "We are calling the config N22. if we look at the price of comparable launch systems, we can see that in terms of kg delivered to LEO, the Falcon 9 is pretty good. As Elon says. A suborbital test flight succeeded in 2016; both orbital flights in 2017 and 2019 failed. Each bubble is positioned according to the vehicle's estimated flyaway cost per kilogram of payload to low Earth orbit (LEO). To our knowledge, this is the first such comprehensive database of launch companies to provide thorough, unbiased, and detailed information in a fully interactive and downloadable format, for public consumption. Whereas an expendable rocket engine design can be pushed to its limits, operating at much higher temperatures and stresses. When the space shuttle was in operation, it could launch a payload . The contrarian argument would be that SpaceX is building the Airbus A380 of launch vehicles impressive engineering that no one wants to fly. The agency has also speculated that a space elevator (requiring 15 years to construct) would lower this cost even further, to just a few dollars per kilogram. For more information on the different vehicles being manufactured and their corresponding data, please see the individual companies websites. If the average person weighs 62 kg, itd be just $806 to transport just their body weight alone, not including other factors of course, but thats still really cheap for space flight. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. You could also compare Starship price to NASA with SLS price to NASA, this tells you something else (like how much money taxpayers can save if switching from SLS to Starship), but OP's comparison is also valid. Both are just marginal cost. Keeping in mind that hydrogen is quite expensive than these two, a typical rocket with 1000 rocket propellant of fuel and oxygen is likely to cost about $100,000. Since this column contains alphabetic characters in many cells, this column will sort alphabetically, not numerically and so the - character has been used to represent unavailable data. Do you feel that your company should have a different rating? Learn more about how you are comparing internal SpaceX costs estimates vs external SLS charges. Christensen has since seen prices drop at both Europes Arianespace and the Atlas V program of United Launch Alliance (ULA), a joint venture of Lockheed Martin and Boeing thats been a regular provider of launches for the U.S. government. Shopping. NUMBER OF ENGINES. Why? Reduced launch prices have opened the New Space frontier of proliferated LEO small satellite mega-constellations that provide Space for Earth services. People are more expensive since they demand annoy things like "breathable air" and what not. How were they able to make an affordable reusable launch vehicle? With the RLV, ISRO is expecting to bring down the cost per launch from the current $5,000 (about Rs 3.33 lakh) per kg to $500 (Rs 33,305) per kg of payload charged to customers. Designed by NASA to be low-cost and reusable, it was the perfect starting point. And so the ULA monopoly persisted with very little incentive to innovate. Continue with Recommended Cookies, Launch costs to low Earth orbit, 1980-2100. Methodology: The LEO payload and cost-per-launch estimates shown in the first graphic represent the lower end of any ranges provided in the FAA's "The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2018." Here again, the Falcon 9 leads the pack. Small launchers on the other hand cost more per kilogram than the other launchers but the launch frequency as well as the responsiveness are improved. Each company has been assigned an SFR rating based on our analysis, publicly available data, and expert insights. The Falcon Heavy rocket, with reusable side boosters, costs $90 million. Then OIG subtracted the . There are three other changes: Ive included medium-lift launch vehicles, made the y-axis a log-scale, and changed the SpaceX-related data points to orange. In comparison, SpaceX's Falcon Heavy, with. If the overall trend continues, access to space may become relatively affordable to most people during the second half of this century. Journey through the history of rocket technology to build excitement for the future of the space economy. PARIS Launch-service provider SpaceX's new price chart shows the performance cost incurred when making the Falcon 9 Full Thrust and Falcon Heavy rockets partially reusable. The first two orbital missions failed in 2009 and 2012, and the rocket finally reached orbit in late 2012. provides the first stage, including engines, First suborbital test in 1969, first orbital launch attempt in 1970, Without Buran, and assuming payload providing orbital insertion. The goals of the EELV program were two-fold: make expendable launch vehicles that were affordable and reliable. Also, numbers to LEO are about as useless of a metric as you can give SLS. (By comparison, the Falcon 9 turn-around-time is ~1 month.) While vehicle launch cost is a metric utilized when comparing vehicles, the cost per lb/kg launched is also an important factor that is not always directly correlated with the overall launch vehicle cost.

Mndot 511 Road Conditions, Power Bi Conditional Formatting Based On Text Measure, Taxi Central Ave Passaic, Nj, Articles L